{"id":52963,"date":"2022-03-07T22:59:33","date_gmt":"2022-03-07T22:59:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/irap.org\/?p=52963"},"modified":"2023-03-08T00:27:06","modified_gmt":"2023-03-08T00:27:06","slug":"iwd-2022-break-the-bias-blog-star-ratings-and-gender-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/irap.org\/fr\/2022\/03\/iwd-2022-break-the-bias-blog-star-ratings-and-gender-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"IWD 2022 Break the Bias Blog - Classement par \u00e9toiles et analyse par sexe"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

As a woman working in transport, I\u2019m aware of how big an issue gender is. It\u2019s not a theoretical or abstract concept for me. I have experienced first-hand the challenges of trying to get from A to B, often via C, D and sometimes E as a pedestrian, bicyclist, public transit user, driver, passenger, on my own, at night, during the off peak, with kids in tow, with two suitcases and kids in tow\u2026 you get the picture. Too often, the transport system feels like a hostile environment that was not created with people like me in mind.<\/p>\n

For women, safety is often the first and foremost consideration in deciding when, where and how to travel. If I take my bike with a child, is there a safe facility I can ride on? If I walk at night, do I risk not being seen on roads where there\u2019s no footpath. If I catch public transit, am I risking my personal safety? Is there streetlighting? It\u2019s the unfortunate reality that in places I live, I am too often forced to select a mode of transport that creates toxic emissions, gives me motion sickness and which costs more <\/em>because of a lack of safe and convenient means to walk, use my bike or take public transit.<\/p>\n

But I am privileged. I have a driving license and access to a vehicle when I need it. Globally, women are far less likely than men to drive, have a licence or a vehicle due to a range of reasons. In many places, car use and ownership are luxuries many cannot afford. Yet despite this, our roads are built to prioritise the comfort, convenience and safety for the privileged few in cars to the detriment of everyone else. In doing so, studies\u2014such as this one in India<\/a>\u2014find that women and girls see a significant proportion public spaces as highly gendered, \u2018frightening\u2019, and to be avoided if possible. This issue doesn\u2019t just affect women of course, it affects children, the elderly, the poor.<\/p>\n

iRAP is a small but global NGO working to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries. iRAP\u2019s road safety assessment method, which gives a road a safety Star Rating, aims to address infrastructure-related risk by giving roads individual Star Ratings for four road user groups\u2014pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and vehicle occupants. This method, which has now been used in over 100 countries, makes it very hard to ignore the safety of other road user groups in the design of our roads and streets.<\/p>\n

It has been tremendously successful. Approximately three million kilometers of roads have been safety assessed or had crash risk mapping completed. iRAP\u2019s method is incorporated into the United Nation\u2019s Global Road Safety Targets<\/em><\/a> and the Global Plan<\/em><\/a> for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030.<\/p>\n

But here at iRAP, we are not ones to rest on our laurels. Gender inequity in transport remains one of the key challenges to ensuring a safer and more equitable future for our children, and as such, we need to do something about it.<\/p>\n

Part of the problem is data, or rather the lack of it. As Caroline Criado Perez argues in her book, Invisible Women<\/em><\/a>, women\u2019s travel patterns and choices are often just that\u2014invisible\u2014meaning road authorities around the world are making critical decisions about transportation infrastructure\u2014decisions which have long-term, often multi-generational, impacts on communities\u2014without taking the needs of everybody into consideration.<\/p>\n

iRAP\u2019s method uses a data driven approach to assess the safety of road users. But like anything that relies on data, it is essential we look at this from a gender perspective to better understand the safety of transport for the modes women use.<\/p>\n

We looked at a sample of cities which completed iRAP assessments with the support of the World Bank Global Road Safety Facility as part of the Bloomberg Philanthropies\u2019 Initiative for Global Road Safety<\/a> between 2015 and 2019, and where data for travel by mode and gender was available.<\/p>\n

The results show a fascinating story. It shows clearly that our road and street networks are, on the whole, less<\/em> safe for women than for men.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s take a look at S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil. Men ride bicycles, motorcycles and drive cars more, whereas women take public transit and walk more. However, there is not an enormous difference between men and women in how they travel. Nevertheless the results by Star Rating show that 50% of trips taken by women happen on 3 stars or better roads. For men, this increases to 57%. The S\u00e3o Paulo data highlights the uneven infrastructure quality, where the risks are greater for those walking and cycling.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/irap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Breaking-the-bias-image-1.png” title_text=”Breaking the bias image 1″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

In Bogota, Colombia, we see are more marked difference between men and women in how they travel, but also that car use is substantially lower overall. Women walk and take public transit more than men, but men are using bicycles and motorcycles in higher numbers. The results show a lower proportion of travel happening on 3 star or better roads for both men and women, which is slightly higher for men at 33% than for women at 30%.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/irap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Breaking-the-bias-image-2.png” title_text=”Breaking the bias image 2″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

In Accra, Ghana, approximately half of men\u2019s trips and two-thirds of women\u2019s trips are done by walking. Despite this, pedestrian infrastructure is of very poor safety standard. This is even more pronounced for women, for whom more than half of the trips are on 1- or 2-star roads.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/irap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Breaking-the-bias-image-3.png” title_text=”Breaking the bias image 3″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Mumbai, India, has perhaps the biggest gender differences in travel mode. Men use motorcycles in a much higher proportion than women, and women use public transit and walk more. These differences in mode also result in significant differences in relative safety. For men, 46% of trips happen on 3-star or better roads, whereas for women, this decreases to 38% of trips.\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/irap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Breaking-the-bias-image-4.png” title_text=”Breaking the bias image 4″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Knowing how and where women travel is first step to make changes. We need more data and we need it disaggregated by gender and mode. We need to routinely assess safety across entire road networks. We need more systematic participation of communities in road planning and design.<\/p>\n

Understanding the gender differences in mode can help transport authorities better plan and design road networks which reflect the diverse needs of all road users. Join us \u00a0to speak up for safe infrastructure for women on the International Women’s Day. <\/a>#Breakthebias #IWD2022<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#008852″ divider_weight=”3px” _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_5,2_5″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”3_5″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

About the author<\/strong><\/p>\n

Monica Olyslagers is iRAP\u2019s Global Innovation Manager and oversees initiatives such as AiRAP<\/em><\/a> for the accelerated and intelligent collection of data for road safety, and CycleRAP<\/em><\/a>, a bicycling and micro-mobility risk assessment model. Monica joined the iRAP team in 2015 as the Programme Coordinator for iRAP\u2019s projects under the Bloomberg Philanthropies Initiative for Global Road Safety<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Monica\u2019s previous roles in the Australian Government’s transport ministry (2007-14) included aviation safety in the PNG and Pacific, the national urban policy and cycling strategy, high speed rail feasibility assessment, and transport policy development.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”2_5″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/irap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/MonicaOlyslagers.png” title_text=”MonicaOlyslagers” _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”10px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”0px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Monica has a keen interest in improving urban environments for people\u2014all people\u2014for a healthier, safer, and more inclusive, equitable and sustainable future. She holds a Master\u2019s degree in Development Planning and a Bachelor\u2019s degree in Psychology and the Arts. Monica lives in Guangzhou, China.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.12.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Special thanks to Shanna Lucchesi for the data analysis and graphics.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Limitations of the analysis presented: \u00a0<\/p>\n